Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 27
Filtrar
1.
Acad Emerg Med ; 31(5): 425-455, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38747203

RESUMEN

The fourth Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Guidelines for Reasonable and Appropriate Care in the Emergency Department (GRACE-4) is on the topic of the emergency department (ED) management of nonopioid use disorders and focuses on alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS), alcohol use disorder (AUD), and cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS). The SAEM GRACE-4 Writing Team, composed of emergency physicians and experts in addiction medicine and patients with lived experience, applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations regarding six priority questions for adult ED patients with AWS, AUD, and CHS. The SAEM GRACE-4 Writing Team reached the following recommendations: (1) in adult ED patients (over the age of 18) with moderate to severe AWS who are being admitted to hospital, we suggest using phenobarbital in addition to benzodiazepines compared to using benzodiazepines alone [low to very low certainty of evidence]; (2) in adult ED patients (over the age of 18) with AUD who desire alcohol cessation, we suggest a prescription for one anticraving medication [very low certainty of evidence]; (2a) in adult ED patients (over the age of 18) with AUD, we suggest naltrexone (compared to no prescription) to prevent return to heavy drinking [low certainty of evidence]; (2b) in adult ED patients (over the age of 18) with AUD and contraindications to naltrexone, we suggest acamprosate (compared to no prescription) to prevent return to heavy drinking and/or to reduce heavy drinking [low certainty of evidence]; (2c) in adult ED patients (over the age of 18) with AUD, we suggest gabapentin (compared to no prescription) for the management of AUD to reduce heavy drinking days and improve alcohol withdrawal symptoms [very low certainty of evidence]; (3a) in adult ED patients (over the age of 18) presenting to the ED with CHS we suggest the use of haloperidol or droperidol (in addition to usual care/serotonin antagonists, e.g., ondansetron) to help with symptom management [very low certainty of evidence]; and (3b) in adult ED patients (over the age of 18) presenting to the ED with CHS, we also suggest offering the use of topical capsaicin (in addition to usual care/serotonin antagonists, e.g., ondansetron) to help with symptom management [very low certainty of evidence].


Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Alcoholismo/complicaciones , Vómitos/tratamiento farmacológico , Vómitos/inducido químicamente , Vómitos/terapia , Adulto , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/tratamiento farmacológico , Cannabinoides/uso terapéutico , Cannabinoides/efectos adversos , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Síndrome , Abuso de Marihuana/complicaciones , Masculino , Femenino , Síndrome de Hiperemesis Cannabinoide
2.
Acad Emerg Med ; 31(3): 263-272, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38060343

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a centrally acting sympatholytic sedative. Abundant evidence from the intensive care unit and other settings demonstrates that the use of DEX is associated with improved sedation-related outcomes. There is a paucity of data on the use and efficacy of DEX in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: We performed a prospective single-center observational cohort study of patients treated with intravenous DEX for any indication in the ED. We performed serial bedside evaluations of sedation depth and delirium and administered standardized questionnaires to ED physicians about their use of DEX. We assessed the incidence of hemodynamic adverse events (HAEs; bradycardia or hypotension), clinically significant HAEs (HAEs accompanied by clinical intervention or discontinuation of DEX), sedation-related ED outcomes, and clinician perception of DEX effectiveness. RESULTS: We enrolled 75 patients treated with DEX in the ED during our study period. The most common indication for DEX was noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (32 patients, 43%). DEX was administered in the ED for a median of 2.6 h (interquartile range [IQR] 1.6-4.9 h), with a median infusion rate of 0.3 µg/kg/h (IQR 0.2-0.4 µg/kg/h). Clinically significant HAE occurred in nine patients (12%, 95% CI 6%-22%). Other sedative or analgesic infusions were administered in the ED to 21 patients (28%). Clinicians felt DEX was highly effective (median [IQR] effectiveness score of 5 [3-5] on a 5-point Likert scale). The median (IQR) ED Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale post-DEX was -1 (-4 to 0). CONCLUSIONS: DEX is used in the ED for diverse indications. Additional data from larger cohorts and comparative studies are required to determine the precise incidence of clinically significant HAE associated with DEX use in the ED. ED clinicians have a positive perception of the effectiveness of DEX.


Asunto(s)
Dexmedetomidina , Humanos , Dexmedetomidina/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes , Analgésicos , Hemodinámica
5.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 61(8): 591-598, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37603042

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: An increasing number of jurisdictions have legalized recreational cannabis for adult use. The subsequent availability and marketing of recreational cannabis has led to a parallel increase in rates and severity of pediatric cannabis intoxications. We explored predictors of severe outcomes in pediatric patients who presented to the emergency department with cannabis intoxication. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we collected data on all pediatric patients (<18 years) who presented with cannabis intoxication from August 2017 through June 2020 to participating sites in the Toxicology Investigators Consortium. In cases that involved polysubstance exposure, patients were included if cannabis was a significant contributing agent. The primary outcome was a composite severe outcome endpoint, defined as an intensive care unit admission or in-hospital death. Covariates included relevant sociodemographic and exposure characteristics. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-eight pediatric patients (54% males, median age 14.0 years, interquartile range 3.7-16.0) presented to a participating emergency department with cannabis intoxication. Fifty-two patients (38%) were admitted to an intensive care unit, including one patient who died. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, polysubstance ingestion (adjusted odds ratio = 16.3; 95% confidence interval: 4.6-58.3; P < 0.001)) and cannabis edibles ingestion (adjusted odds ratio = 5.5; 95% confidence interval: 1.9-15.9; P = 0.001) were strong independent predictors of severe outcome. In an age-stratified regression analysis, in children older than >10 years, only polysubstance abuse remained an independent predictor for the severe outcome (adjusted odds ratio 37.1; 95% confidence interval: 6.2-221.2; P < 0.001). As all children 10 years and younger ingested edibles, a dedicated multivariable analysis could not be performed (unadjusted odds ratio 3.3; 95% confidence interval: 1.6-6.7). CONCLUSIONS: Severe outcomes occurred for different reasons and were largely associated with the patient's age. Young children, all of whom were exposed to edibles, were at higher risk of severe outcomes. Teenagers with severe outcomes were frequently involved in polysubstance exposure, while psychosocial factors may have played a role.


Asunto(s)
Cannabis , Enfermedades Transmitidas por los Alimentos , Alucinógenos , Intoxicación por Plantas , Masculino , Adulto , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Preescolar , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Psicotrópicos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Sistema de Registros
6.
Acad Emerg Med ; 30(3): 196-208, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36448276

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine (DEX), a centrally acting alpha-2 agonist, is increasingly used for sedation in multiple clinical settings. Evidence from the intensive care unit and operative settings suggests DEX may have significant advantages over traditional GABAergic sedatives such as benzodiazepines. There has been limited research on the use of DEX in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the medical literature to identify all published evidence regarding the use of DEX in the ED. We included randomized and nonrandomized studies and studies reporting any use of DEX in the ED, even when it was not the primary focus of the study. Two authors reviewed studies for inclusion, and a single author assessed studies for quality and risk of bias and abstracted data. RESULTS: We identified 35 studies meeting inclusion criteria, including 11 randomized controlled trials, 13 cohort and other nonrandomized studies, and 11 case reports and case series. Significant heterogeneity in interventions, comparators, indications, and outcomes precluded data pooling and meta-analysis. We found modest evidence that DEX was efficacious in facilitating medical imaging and mixed and limited evidence regarding its efficacy for procedural sedation and sedation of nonintubated medical and psychiatric patients. Our results suggested that DEX is associated with bradycardia and hypotension, which are generally transient and infrequently require medical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: A limited body of generally poor- to moderate-quality evidence suggests that the use of DEX may be efficacious in certain clinical scenarios in the ED and that DEX use in the ED is likely safe. Further high-quality research into DEX use in the ED setting is needed, with a particular focus on clear and consistent selection of indications, identification of clear and clinically relevant primary outcomes, and careful assessment of the clinical implications of the hemodynamic effects of DEX therapy.


Asunto(s)
Dexmedetomidina , Hipotensión , Humanos , Dexmedetomidina/efectos adversos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/efectos adversos , Benzodiazepinas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital
7.
J Med Toxicol ; 19(1): 16-25, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36175787

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Non-native snake envenomations in the United States are uncommon with much unknown about a patient's presenting signs and symptoms. Antivenoms for non-native snake envenomations are not typically available in hospital pharmacies which may limit their administration. What are the clinical presentations, treatments, and outcomes of non-native snake envenomation cases reported to the North American Snakebite Registry (NASBR) of the Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC)? METHODS: This is a descriptive review of all non-native envenomations reported to the NASBR from 2013 to March 2022. Data abstracted included snake species, patient history, clinical signs, diagnostics, treatment (including antivenom usage), follow-up, and final outcome. RESULTS: We identified 19 non-native snake envenomations resulting from encounters with eleven different species, eight of which belonged to the Viperidae family. The most common presenting symptoms were edema (18 patients), ecchymosis (seven patients), and necrosis (six patients). Systemic effects and hematologic abnormalities were less common. The most common treatments were extremity elevation and analgesia, with two patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Ten patients received antivenom. No patients died. Three patients had loss of mobility in a digit at the last follow-up visit. One patient had permanent tissue loss of a small area on a finger. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that non-native snake envenomations in the United States frequently cause local soft tissue effects and less frequently cause systemic or hematologic effects. Most patients received antivenom, although several patients envenomated by snakes for which a specific antivenom exists did not receive any. Sequelae at the last follow-up of such encounters consisted of local mobility deficits.


Asunto(s)
Mordeduras de Serpientes , Animales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Mordeduras de Serpientes/diagnóstico , Mordeduras de Serpientes/epidemiología , Mordeduras de Serpientes/terapia , Antivenenos/uso terapéutico , Serpientes , Sistema de Registros , América del Norte/epidemiología
9.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 60(12): 1356-1375, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36346349

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Dexmedetomidine is an alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist which is widely used for sedation. Dexmedetomidine does not suppress the respiratory drive and produces a state of cooperative sedation; it may be associated with beneficial outcomes in the general critical care population. The role of dexmedetomidine in the treatment of toxicologic conditions (excluding alcohol withdrawal) is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To critically assess and summarize the literature regarding the use of dexmedetomidine in toxicologic conditions other than alcohol withdrawal. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the medical literature to identify all existing evidence regarding the use of dexmedetomidine for toxicologic conditions. We excluded reviews and commentary, studies reporting exclusively on alcohol withdrawal, and studies reporting the use of dexmedetomidine to treat iatrogenic sedative withdrawal in the intensive care unit. We also performed a review of the Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC) database for patients treated with dexmedetomidine. RESULTS: We identified 98 studies meeting inclusion criteria; 87 of these were case reports or case series, representing 99 unique cases. Eleven articles with other designs were identified, which included 138 patients treated with dexmedetomidine for toxicologic conditions. Ninety-three cases from the ToxIC registry met inclusion criteria. Common indications for dexmedetomidine included stimulant intoxication, sedative withdrawal, serotonin syndrome, antimuscarinic toxidrome, opioid withdrawal, and cannabinoid intoxication. Dexmedetomidine was usually administered by continuous infusion; bolus administration was reported in a minority of cases. Adverse effects were uncommon. The quality of evidence was generally low, given the preponderance of case reports, the rate of missing or poorly reported data, and the near-universal co-administration of other sedatives. TREATMENT OF STIMULANT POISONING: Fifty-nine patients with stimulant poisoning were treated with dexmedetomidine. There was reasonably good evidence that dexmedetomidine was helpful in the treatment of stimulant poisoning. TREATMENT OF SEDATIVE WITHDRAWAL: Twenty-two patients with sedative withdrawal were treated with dexmedetomidine. Several case reports of very high-quality suggested efficacy of dexmedetomidine for this indication, particularly for baclofen withdrawal. TREATMENT OF SEROTONIN SYNDROME: Twenty-six patients with serotonin syndrome were treated with dexmedetomidine. This evidence was of lower quality due to missing clinical details, potential overdiagnosis of serotonin syndrome, and near-universal concomitant treatment with other sedatives. TREATMENT OF ANTIMUSCARINIC POISONING: Forty-two patients with antimuscarinic poisoning were treated with dexmedetomidine. This evidence was of low quality and was limited by infrequent use of the preferred antidote, physostigmine. TREATMENT OF OPIOID WITHDRAWAL: Forty-four patients with opioid withdrawal were treated with dexmedetomidine. This evidence was of low quality due to missing clinical details and near-universal concomitant treatment with other agents. The one high-quality trial reported the use of dexmedetomidine in ultra-rapid opioid detoxification, which is not indicated in modern practice. TREATMENT OF CANNABINOID INTOXICATION: Five patients with cannabinoid intoxication were treated with dexmedetomidine. No definite conclusion can be drawn from the limited available evidence. DISCUSSION: It is important to distinguish between the use of dexmedetomidine as a general sedative, which is likely to increase as the overall utilization of dexmedetomidine in critical care settings increases, and the use of dexmedetomidine as a specific pharmacologic treatment for a toxicologic condition. Well-established pharmacologic data from animal and human studies suggest dexmedetomidine counteracts stimulant-induced norepinephrine release. The mechanism by which dexmedetomidine treats sedative withdrawal is unclear. Some animal data show that dexmedetomidine may indirectly suppress serotonin release, which may suggest a role for dexmedetomidine in this condition. CONCLUSIONS: There is a small and generally low-quality body of evidence which suggests that dexmedetomidine may be helpful in the treatment of certain toxicologic conditions, particularly stimulant intoxication and sedative withdrawal. Further high-quality research is needed to clarify the role of dexmedetomidine in patients with toxicologic conditions.


Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo , Dexmedetomidina , Síndrome de la Serotonina , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias , Humanos , Dexmedetomidina/uso terapéutico , Dexmedetomidina/farmacología , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Alcoholismo/tratamiento farmacológico , Antagonistas Muscarínicos , Síndrome de la Serotonina/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Narcóticos
10.
J Med Toxicol ; 18(4): 344-349, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35790679

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Benzonatate is a local anesthetic-like sodium channel antagonist that is widely prescribed as an antitussive. While it may be reasonable to assume that patients would present with a prolonged QRS interval following benzonatate overdose, the published literature does not support this. We report a case of a patient presenting following a benzonatate overdose with a prolonged QRS on her initial electrocardiograph (ECG) rhythm strip with rapid normalization of QRS duration. CASE REPORT: A 14-year-old girl presented in cardiac arrest following a benzonatate overdose. The patient was found in cardiac arrest within minutes of last being known well. Bystanders immediately provided cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and she was in asystole on emergency medical services (EMS) arrival. Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was obtained following administration of intraosseous epinephrine and naloxone. EMS obtained an ECG rhythm strip following ROSC demonstrating a sinus rhythm with a QRS duration of 160 ms. Over the ensuing 30 minutes, there was progressive narrowing of the QRS. A 12-lead ECG obtained on arrival in the emergency department (ED) 44 minutes later demonstrated a QRS duration of 94 ms. Initially, EMS ECG rhythm strips were unavailable and an isolated benzonatate ingestion was considered less likely as ECG intervals were normal. Benzonatate exposure was later confirmed with a urine benzonatate concentration, which was 8.5 mcg/mL. The patient made a full recovery. DISCUSSION: Cases of pediatric benzonatate overdose with rapid development of cardiac arrest and full recovery have been previously reported. In this case, evidence of cardiac sodium channel blockade was demonstrated with a prolonged QRS interval on initial ECG rhythm strip analysis. However, unlike previous cases, rapid resolution of QRS prolongation occurred in this case. While transient QRS prolongation may be observed, finding a normal QRS interval should not discount the possibility of benzonatate overdose.


Asunto(s)
Antitusígenos , Sobredosis de Droga , Paro Cardíaco , Adolescente , Anestésicos Locales , Arritmias Cardíacas , Butilaminas , Niño , Sobredosis de Droga/diagnóstico , Sobredosis de Droga/terapia , Epinefrina , Femenino , Paro Cardíaco/inducido químicamente , Paro Cardíaco/diagnóstico , Humanos , Naloxona , Canales de Sodio
11.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 9(7): ofac230, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35836749

RESUMEN

Long-acting cabotegravir (CAB-LA) provides an exciting new option for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in multiple populations. In this Perspective, we consider the unique pharmacokinetics of CAB-LA and the potential impact on the prescribing of CAB-LA, specifically in cis-women of reproductive potential.

15.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 60(6): 688-693, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35048759

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Patients with opioid use disorder may have difficulty transitioning from full-agonist opioids to sublingual buprenorphine due to the risk of precipitated opioid withdrawal. Novel strategies have been developed to facilitate this transition, including the use of micro-dosing with transdermal buprenorphine. We began using a transdermal buprenorphine transition strategy at our hospital in 2019. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational cohort study of patients treated with transdermal buprenorphine to facilitate transition from full-agonist opioids (prescribed or recreational) while hospitalized between January 2019 and December 2020. Patients were excluded if transdermal buprenorphine was given for pain, if they did not receive at least one dose of sublingual buprenorphine while hospitalized, or if their clinical course precluded analysis of their tolerance of the transition protocol. Data on the doses and timing of medications, symptoms during transition, and hospital outcomes were abstracted from the electronic medical record. RESULTS: We identified 41 cases that satisfied inclusion and exclusion criteria. Thirty-five cases involved a transition from medically indicated opioids; of these, 8 cases involved a transition from methadone. Six cases involved a transition from illicit opioids used prior to hospital presentation. For patient transitioning from medically indicated opioids, the median milligram morphine equivalent (MME) on the day prior to transdermal buprenorphine application was 63.8 (range 0-900, IQR 153.8) and the median MME on the day of transdermal buprenorphine application was 34.5 (range 0-600, IQR 65.3). The median initial dose of sublingual buprenorphine administered was 8 mg (range 2-8mg, IQR 6mg), the median total first-day dose was 16mg (range 2-24mg, IQR 16mg), and the median total daily dose on the last day of follow-up was 16mg (range 2-24mg, IQR 16mg). In 38 cases, patients completed the transition to sublingual buprenorphine and were still taking buprenorphine at the time they left the hospital. The transition protocol was fairly well-tolerated, with 59% of cases tolerating it well and 32% tolerating it fairly. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that the use of transdermal buprenorphine to facilitate transition to sublingual buprenorphine is generally well-tolerated, and may be helpful in hospitalized patients. We identified several areas for improvement in future practice by reviewing the clinical courses of patients who tolerated transition poorly. Limitations of the study include its retrospective chart review design, the lack of a standardized transition protocol during the study period, and the lack of standardized data in the medical record regarding patients' tolerance of the transition protocol. Future research should include prospective studies using a standardized protocol and structured, pre-planned assessments of opioid withdrawal during the transition period. CONCLUSION: The use of transdermal buprenorphine to facilitate induction of sublingual buprenorphine therapy in hospitalized patients with OUD was generally well-tolerated in this single-center retrospective observational study. Further prospective research is needed to demonstrate efficacy and optimize treatment protocols.


Asunto(s)
Buprenorfina , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Buprenorfina/uso terapéutico , Hospitales , Humanos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/tratamiento farmacológico
17.
Crit Care Clin ; 37(3): 577-589, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34053707

RESUMEN

Medications used to treat diabetes mellitus are heterogeneous, with widely differing safety profiles in therapeutic use and in overdose. Insulin overdose may produce severe and prolonged hypoglycemia. Sulfonylurea poisoning should be treated with octreotide, sparing intravenous dextrose where possible. Acute metformin overdose may lead to life-threatening acidosis with elevated lactate concentrations, which may require hemodialysis. Glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors are benign in overdose in diabetic patients but may produce profound hypoglycemia in nondiabetic patients. Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis may develop in critically ill patients taking sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV , Metformina , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2 , Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/uso terapéutico
19.
J Org Chem ; 85(23): 15256-15272, 2020 Dec 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33147019

RESUMEN

Homoconjugation and intramolecular "through-space" charge transfers are molecular phenomena that have been studied since the 1960s. A detailed understanding and control of these effects would provide a tool to tune the optoelectronic properties of organic molecules in respect of the necessities for applications such as for organic electronics. Triptycene is a perfect candidate to investigate homoconjugation effects due to its three-dimensional alignment of three aromatic phenylene units, separated by two methine bridges. Here, a series of 16 π-extended triptycenes with up to three different permuted electron-accepting units and an electron-rich veratrole unit are studied in detail by UV/vis spectroscopy and cyclovoltammetry in combination with DFT calculations to get a deeper understanding of homoconjugation and charge-transfer processes of triptycenes. Furthermore, the gained knowledge can be exploited to construct triptycene-based electron acceptors with fine-tuned adjustment of electronic properties, such as electron affinities, by thorough choice of the aromatic blades that interact through homoconjugation.

20.
Nanoscale Horiz ; 5(3): 473-480, 2020 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32118226

RESUMEN

This work rationalizes, for the first time, the electroluminescent behavior of a representative red-emitting contorted nanographene -i.e., hexabenzoovalene derivative - in small molecule light-emitting electrochemical cells (SM-LECs). This new emitter provides devices with irradiances of ca. 220 µW cm-2 (242 cd m-2), external quantum efficiencies (EQE) of 0.78% (<25% loss of the maximum theoretical EQE), and stabilities over 200 h. Upon optimizing the device architecture, the stability increased up to 3600 h (measured) and 13 000 h (extrapolated) at a high brightness of ca. 30 µW cm-2 (34 cd m-2). This represents a record stability at a high brightness level compared to the state-of-the-art SM-LECs (1000 h at 0.3 µW cm-2). In addition, we rationalized one of the very rare LEC examples in which the changes of the electroluminescence band shape relates to the dependence of the relative intensity of the vibrational peaks with electric field, as corroborated by dynamic electrochemical impedance spectroscopy assays. Nevertheless, this exclusive electroluminescence behavior does not affect the device color, realizing one of the most stable, bright, and efficient red-emitting SM-LECs up to date.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...